Isn't the US superior to the former Soviet Union?
Capitalism in the United States is over 150 years old, socialism in the
Soviet Union is only 50 years old. To compare the two is, therefore, as unfair
as comparing the strength of a grown man with that of a baby just beginning to
walk. Furthermore, the Soviet Union was a backward industrial country devastated by
war and famine at its birth; it had just begun to grow when it was laid waste a
second time in World War II. Obviously the relative merit of socialism and
capitalism is not proven by choosing for comparison the richest capitalist
country in the world, the one most advanced industrially and least affected by
war’s devastation. A fairer comparison would be the capitalism of Tsarist Russia with the
socialism of the Soviet Union. Here every impartial observer agrees that
socialism is far and away superior in every respect. Similarly, a fairer comparison would be that between capitalist United States
and a socialist United States. In no other country are the material conditions so ripe for socialism.
Nowhere could the change-over from capitalist insecurity, want, and war, to
socialist security, abundance, and peace be made so speedily and with such a
minimum of chaos and discomfort. Where other countries on the road to socialism
must make great sacrifices to obtain the industrial plant, scientific and
technical knowledge, ours is ready to hand. In other countries, as in the Soviet
Union, the people must go without, temporarily, in order to create the capacity
to produce abundance; in the United States the productive forces have been built—they
need only to be liberated. That, capitalism cannot do, and socialism could.
Huberman and Sweezy, "Introduction to Socialism," Monthly Review